Q & A – I am using Nylon 6 with moly additives as a bearing and wonder how it compares to your CJ Bearing?
Tuesday, May 18th, 2010by Dave Biering
Moly filled cast nylon bearings have been used very successfully for many years. The known drawbacks of nylon has always been it’s inherent tendancy to absorb moisture over time and thus causing swelling of the material. More than that, the constant absorption and drying cycle leads to fatigue failure over time. The CJ bearing has zero absorption in moisture, is stronger in terms of compressive strength and resistance to deformation, has a thermal expansion rate the same as steel and has a very low friction. Since the CJ requires no lubrication, it is as close to maintenance free as you can get. In independant testing it was shown that wear life of the CJ is significantly better as well. In rotary wear tests we found that the Nylon/MOS2 had a weight loss of over 180mg after 50 hours. The CJ had 100.5 mg of loss in the same test. Load for the test was 2000 psi at 25 sfpm and temperatures and humidity were controlled in the lab at 78F and 50% humidity. For more information on the CJ Bearing products visit www.tstar.com and check out the Video Library and our on line catalog.
